Sujet : Re: question about linker
De : janis_papanagnou+ng (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Janis Papanagnou)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 07. Dec 2024, 16:19:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vj1p29$35cn2$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
On 07.12.2024 15:57, Bart wrote:
The two examples need to be written like this to be valid:
do while (cond) ; while (cond);
do ; while (cond) ; while (cond);
So this /is/ two nested loops followed by two consecutive ones. The
difference is that semicolon.
Someone here already called things like that as "condensed" (or some
such), meaning that syntax is strict and has few redundancies; small
changes are meaningful and relevant. (Nothing for sloppy hackers, for
sure.)
[...]
Those suggesting that semicolons are unimportant details of syntax in C
are wrong. [...]
I don't recall; who said that?
Janis