Sujet : HHH(DD) --- COMPUTE ACTUAL MAPPING FROM INPUT TO OUTPUT
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 15. Apr 2025, 16:29:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vtlu0a$3vgp0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/15/2025 3:25 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-04-15 03:41:02 +0000, olcott said:
On 4/14/2025 8:45 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 15/04/2025 02:18, olcott wrote:
On 4/14/2025 7:39 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 14/04/2025 12:56, olcott wrote:
>
<snip>
>
When people insist that a termination analyzer reports
on behavior other than the behavior that its finite string
input specifies this is isomorphic to requiring a perfectly
geometric square circle in the same two dimensional plane,
simply logically impossible, thus an incorrect requirement.
>
A termination analyzer that works is simply logically impossible, thus an incorrect requirement.
>
>
THAT IS A STUPID THING TO SAY THAT COMPLETELY IGNORES WHAT
COMPUTABLE FUNCTIONS ARE AND HOW THEY WORK.
>
You said precisely the same thing in reply to dbush. I have addressed your remark there, so I see no value in repeating my reply here.
>
HHH CORRECTLY REPORTS ON THE PATHOLOGICAL SELF-REFERENCE THAT
ITS INPUT SPECIFIES. THE DIRECT EXECUTION HAS NO SUCH PSR.
>
You say so,
>
Ignoring verified facts does not make them go away.
Ignoring verified proofs does not meke them go away.
But you keep ignoring them anyway.
int DD()
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
It is a verified fact that the input to HHH(DD) specifies
recursive simulation because DD defines a pathological
relationship with HHH.
It is flat out stupid to think that HHH should report on
behavior other than this specified behavior. Only people
that have zero depth of understanding would suggest this.
a function is computable if there exists an
algorithm that can do the job of the function,
i.e. given an input of the function domain it
can return the corresponding output.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computable_function*corresponding output to the input*
*corresponding output to the input*
*corresponding output to the input*
*corresponding output to the input*
Not freaking allowed to look at any damn thing
else besides the freaking input. Must compute whatever
mapping ACTUALLY EXISTS FROM THIS INPUT.
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…