Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig. Was: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c  
Sujet : Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig. Was: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"
De : bluemanedhawk (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Blue-Maned_Hawk)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 09. Mar 2024, 08:23:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <pan$36217$35e3ad0b$854a5663$e69ccd67@invalid.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Pan/0.154 (Izium; 517acf4)
Richard Harnden wrote:

I think Hawk│ is either woke
or entitled.
No, i just have principles that i stick to.  (Besides, i'm much further left than anyone who is “woke”.)
--
Blue-Maned_Hawk│shortens to Hawk│/
blu.mɛin.dÊ°ak/
│he/him/his/himself/Mr.
blue-maned_hawk.srht.site
Indefinite edition!

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Mar 24 * Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig. Was: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"8Blue-Maned_Hawk
7 Mar 24 +* Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig. Was: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"4Kaz Kylheku
7 Mar 24 i+* Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig. Was: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"2Richard Harnden
9 Mar 24 ii`- Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig. Was: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"1Blue-Maned_Hawk
9 Mar 24 i`- Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig. Was: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"1Blue-Maned_Hawk
7 Mar 24 +* Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig. Was: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"2Keith Thompson
7 Mar 24 i`- Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig. Was: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"1gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
7 Mar 24 `- Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig. Was: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"1James Kuyper

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal