Sujet : Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.lang.c++ comp.lang.cDate : 12. Mar 2024, 01:03:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uso64i$3t3jn$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:01:21 +0100, David Brown wrote:
It seems much more appropriate for Ada (though Pascal also had stricter
checking and stronger types than most other popular languages had when
Pascal was developed).
That’s why Ada was built on Pascal: if you want something intended for
high-reliability, safety-critical applications, why not build it on a
foundation that was already the most, shall we say, anal-retentive, among
well-known languages of the time?
Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"
Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"