Sujet : Re: Word For Today: “Uglification”
De : Keith.S.Thompson+u (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Keith Thompson)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 12. Mar 2024, 03:56:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None to speak of
Message-ID : <87o7bk88ew.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:15:06 -0700, Keith Thompson wrote:
>
If the standard library includes code from two or more different
implementers, all implementers have a very strong interest in avoiding
any clashes. I don't see a real problem here.
>
... until the Birthday Paradox comes into play.
The Birthday Paradox comes into play for random birthdays over which the
participants have no control, not for library implementers who control
their own namespaces and are strongly motivated to avoid collisions.
Do you have a real-world example of such a collision?
-- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.comWorking, but not speaking, for Medtronicvoid Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */