Re: Radians Or Degrees?

On 3/17/2024 1:41 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 3/15/2024 3:48 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:

"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes:

On 3/15/2024 2:26 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
[...]

Notice how the numbers are small? However, if we zoom in enough,
then 2^53 might become an issue..

[...]
>
Argh! I mean if we zoom in enough, then only 2^53 of precision might
become an issue... We can go in really deep:
>
A deep zoom might be 10^275. Somebody did one to the 10^4141! I feel
like including a youtube link here, but I will refrain out of respect
for you.

>
I don't object to YouTube links as long as they're reasonably relevant
and there's enough information for readers to decide whether it's worth
their time to open them.
>

 Fair enough. :^)

Fwiw, another algorithm of mine that would benefit from high precision... The fun part is that a point can be placed anywhere in the field. So, it can be a big one. Depending on the users placement, so to speak:
https://gallery.bridgesmathart.org/exhibitions/2024-joint-mathematics-meetings/chris-m-thomasson