Sujet : Re: A Famous Security Bug
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 24. Mar 2024, 15:22:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240324172225.00006b10@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 11:26:03 +0000
bart <
bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
On 23/03/2024 07:26, James Kuyper wrote:
bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
On 22/03/2024 17:14, James Kuyper wrote:
[...]
If you want to tell a system not only what a program must do, but
also how it must do it, you need to use a lower-level language
than C.
>
Which one?
That's up to you. The point is, C is NOT that language.
I'm asking which /mainstream/ HLL is lower level than C. So
specifically ruling out assembly.
>
Do you want mainstream of today or mainstream of the past also count?
For later, I'd think that PL/M and BLISS are lower level than C.
But I know neither so could be wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PL/Mhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLISSAda also allows certain degree of control on how things done, but I
am not sure that control is tighter than in C. I would think that in
majority of situations Ada's 'as if' rules are similar to C.