Sujet : Re: remark on defining size of basic types
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 04. Apr 2024, 03:44:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uul461$d88r$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 03:46:46 +0200, fir wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 01:34:48 +0200, fir wrote:
>
here is a problem in using 64 big ints on windows ...
>
#include <stdint.h>
>
int64_t signed_64bit_int;
uint64_t unsigned_64bit_int;
>
maybe but thats not the point
If you want specific-sized types, that’s the standard C mechanism for
providing them.
remark on defining size of basic types
Re: remark on defining size of basic types