Sujet : Re: C23 thoughts and opinions - why so conservative?
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 23. May 2024, 15:19:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240523171911.00002f5a@yahoo.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Wed, 22 May 2024 18:55:36 +0200
David Brown <
david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
In an attempt to bring some topicality to the group, has anyone
started using, or considering, C23 ? There's quite a lot of change
in it, especially compared to the minor changes in C17.
>
Why C Standard Committee, while being recently quite liberal in field
of introducing new keywords (too liberal for my liking, many new things
do not really deserve keywords not prefixed by __) is so conservative
in introduction of program control constructs? I don't remember any
new program control introduced under Committee regime.
And I want at least one.
Another area that was mostly unchanged since 1st edition of K&R is
storage classes. Even such obvious thing as removal of 'auto' class
took too long. If I am not mistaken, totally obsolete 'register' class
is still allowed. And I don't remember any additions.
Personally I can think about at least two useful backward-compatible
additions in that area.