Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?

On 5/23/2024 8:10 PM, Sam wrote:

olcott writes:
 

>
This is the worst chunk of code I've seen in at least fifteen years. It shows a complete lack of understanding of fundamental principles of C and C++.
>

>
It is the computer science of the Peter Linz halting
problem proof translated into C. This too is a template:

 It's completely wrong. It suffers from a fundamental flaw of using an inverse logical loop that makes its boolean logic produce an irrational identity matrix.
 The shown code is worthless. It'll never work. Try again, from step 1. Start with the K&R book, beginning with Chapter 1.
 

Can we please get back to the C or do you really want
to stay off topic?

 As I already explained, it's syntactically invalid C, that no self-respecting C compiler will accept as well-formed code.
 

Fibber !
On 5/20/2024 9:23 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
 > The code as presented is a valid C *translation unit*, but it is
 > not a valid *program*, and it has no behavior.
 >
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer