Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?

On 5/23/2024 8:10 PM, Sam wrote:

olcott writes:
>

>
This is the worst chunk of code I've seen in at least fifteen years. It shows a complete lack of understanding of fundamental principles of C and C++.
>

>
It is the computer science of the Peter Linz halting
problem proof translated into C. This too is a template:

>
It's completely wrong. It suffers from a fundamental flaw of using an inverse logical loop that makes its boolean logic produce an irrational identity matrix.
>
The shown code is worthless. It'll never work. Try again, from step 1. Start with the K&R book, beginning with Chapter 1.
>

Can we please get back to the C or do you really want
to stay off topic?

>
As I already explained, it's syntactically invalid C, that no self-respecting C compiler will accept as well-formed code.
>

 Fibber !

On 5/20/2024 9:23 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
 > The code as presented is a valid C *translation unit*, but it is
 > not a valid *program*, and it has no behavior.
 >