Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts

On 5/28/2024 8:36 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 5/28/2024 4:12 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/28/2024 5:24 PM, wij wrote:

On Tue, 2024-05-28 at 17:12 -0500, olcott wrote:

On 5/28/2024 3:11 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 5/28/2024 7:11 AM, olcott wrote:
[...]

H is a pure simulator or a pure function.

[...]
Can you show us a little pseudo code for H?

>
>
Just assume that H is an x86 emulator that emulates
its input function with the input to this function.
>

>
Obvious it is not. You are hiding your lies and expect people lies the same!!!
>

>
I can't possibly be lying about a hypothetical example.
What if squares were round? cannot possibly be a lie.
>

 Did you code up H?

Yes it has been fully operational for a couple of years.
I am not an never have been talking about that H in this post.
It is really not that hard to understand that H(D,D) simulates
the x86 machine code of D with an x86 emulator for finite number
of steps. I have taken all of these "struggles" as mere head games.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer