Sujet : Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 29. May 2024, 10:44:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240529124443.0000600f@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Wed, 29 May 2024 09:21:09 +0300
Michael S <
already5chosen@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 29 May 2024 01:29:00 +0100
bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
I think runtime is still primarily spent in I/O.
That's undoubtedly correct.
:(
Two hours later it turned out to be completely incorrect. That is, the
time was spent in routine related to I/O, but in the 'soft' part of it
rather than in the I/O itself.
Hopefully, next time I'd remember to avoid the word 'undoubtedly'.