Sujet : Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 30. May 2024, 22:21:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v3aqk9$1rqh3$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/30/2024 5:40 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 30.05.2024 um 13:23 schrieb bart:
On 30/05/2024 02:31, Malcolm McLean wrote:
On 30/05/2024 01:18, bart wrote:
On 29/05/2024 22:46, Malcolm McLean wrote:
>
Baby X can't compete.
>
Huh? I didn't know Baby X was an OS!
>
>
Its an API. You call the Baby X API to get buttons and menus and other graphical elements, instead of Windows APIs. And it has just got its own file system.
>
Hardly anybody uses the WinAPI directly.
There are still a lot of desktop-appliatons written with MFC.
MFC is nearly without abstraction and feels like a more productive
WinAPI for GUI-purposes.
[...]
Remember those old message cracker macros? ;^)
xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions