Sujet : Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 03. Jun 2024, 08:54:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v3jsr6$3qce8$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; )
On Wed, 29 May 2024 14:38:14 +0200, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 29.05.2024 um 14:10 schrieb David Brown:
I've seen odd things with timings due to Windows' relatively poor IO,
file and disk handling. Many years ago when I had need of
speed-testing some large windows-based build system, I found it was
faster running in a virtual windows machine on VirtualBox on a Linux
host, than in native Windows on the same hardware.
Windows kernel I/O is rather efficient ...
But you can’t get to it.
xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions