Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c  
Sujet : Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions
De : nospam (at) *nospam* needed.invalid (Paul)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 04. Jun 2024, 04:46:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v3lv5h$8pdr$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Ratcatcher/2.0.0.25 (Windows/20130802)
On 6/3/2024 12:39 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
There's a good reason for sth. like #embed: I just wrote a very quick
xxd alternative and generated a C-file with a char-array and the size
of this file is 1,2GB. MSVC quitted compilation after allocating 50GB
of memory, gcc and clang compiled for minutes. This would be better
with an #embed-Tag. So there's really good reason for that.
This is my xxd-substitude. Compared to xxd it only can dump C-files.
On my PC it's about 15 times faster than xxd because it does its own
I/O-buffering.
 
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <charconv>
#include <span>
#include <vector>
 
using namespace std;
 
int main( int argc, char **argv )
{
    if( argc < 4 )
        return EXIT_FAILURE;
    char const
        *inFile = argv[1],
        *symbol = argv[2],
        *outFile = argv[3];
    ifstream ifs;
    ifs.exceptions( ifstream::failbit | ifstream::badbit );
    ifs.open( inFile, ifstream::binary | ifstream::ate );
    streampos size( ifs.tellg() );
    if( size > (size_t)-1 )
        return EXIT_FAILURE;
    ifs.seekg( ifstream::beg );
    union ndi { char c; ndi() {} };
    vector<ndi> rawBytes( size );
    span<char> bytes( &rawBytes.data()->c, rawBytes.size() );
    ifs.read( bytes.data(), bytes.size() );
    ofstream ofs;
    ofs.exceptions( ofstream::failbit | ofstream::badbit );
    ofs.open( outFile );
    vector<ndi> rawBuf( 0x100000 );
    span<char> buf( &rawBuf.begin()->c, rawBuf.size() );
    ofs << "unsigned char " << symbol << "[" << (size_t)size << "] = \n{\n";
    auto rd = bytes.begin();
    auto wrt = buf.begin();
    auto flush = [&]
    {
        ofs.write( buf.data(), wrt - buf.begin() );
        wrt = buf.begin();
    };
    while( rd != bytes.end() )
    {
        size_t remaining = bytes.end() - rd;
        constexpr size_t N_LINE = 1 + 12 * 6 - 1 + 1;
        size_t n = remaining > 12 ? 12 : remaining;
        auto rowEnd = rd + n;
        *wrt++ = '\t';
        do
        {
            *wrt++ = '0';
            *wrt++ = 'x';
            char *wb = to_address( wrt );
            (void)(wrt + 2);
            auto tcr = to_chars( wb, wb + 2, (unsigned char)*rd++, 16 );
            if( tcr.ptr == wb + 1 )
                wb[1] = wb[0],
                wb[0] = '0';
            wrt += 2;
            if( rd != bytes.end() )
            {
                *wrt++ = ',';
                if( rd != rowEnd )
                    *wrt++ = ' ';
            }
        } while( rd != rowEnd );
        *wrt++ = '\n';
        if( buf.end() - wrt < N_LINE )
            flush();
    }
    flush();
    ofs << "};\n" << endl;
}

It would be nice to see small samplings of the files used
for input and output. Just a couple lines of the "meat" section
would be sufficient.

For anything larger, https://pastebin.com/ could hold up to 512KB
of text, for a small sample of each. Some of the USENET servers
have limits on message size. For a binary file, you can just use
the hex editor representation of the binary file.

Offset(h) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0A 0B 0C 0D 0E 0F

00000000  4D 5A 50 00 02 00 00 00 04 00 0F 00 FF FF 00 00  MZP.........ÿÿ..
00000010  B8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 1A 00 00 00 00 00  ¸.......@.......
00000020  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
00000030  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00  ................
00000040  BA 10 00 0E 1F B4 09 CD 21 B8 01 4C CD 21 90 90  º....´.Í!¸.LÍ!..
00000050  54 68 69 73 20 70 72 6F 67 72 61 6D 20 6D 75 73  This program mus
00000060  74 20 62 65 20 72 75 6E 20 75 6E 64 65 72 20 57  t be run under W
00000070  69 6E 33 32 0D 0A 24 37 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  in32..$7........

   Paul

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 May 24 * C23 thoughts and opinions524David Brown
22 May 24 +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions355Thiago Adams
22 May 24 i+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions352David Brown
22 May 24 ii+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions22Thiago Adams
23 May 24 iii`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions21David Brown
23 May 24 iii `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions20Thiago Adams
23 May 24 iii  +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions18David Brown
23 May 24 iii  i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions17Thiago Adams
23 May 24 iii  i `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions16Keith Thompson
24 May 24 iii  i  +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1David Brown
24 May 24 iii  i  `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions14Thiago Adams
24 May 24 iii  i   `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions13Keith Thompson
24 May 24 iii  i    `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions12Thiago Adams
24 May 24 iii  i     `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions11Keith Thompson
25 May 24 iii  i      `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions10Thiago Adams
25 May 24 iii  i       +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions4Keith Thompson
25 May 24 iii  i       i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions3Thiago Adams
25 May 24 iii  i       i `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2David Brown
26 May 24 iii  i       i  `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Keith Thompson
25 May 24 iii  i       `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions5David Brown
25 May 24 iii  i        `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions4Thiago Adams
25 May 24 iii  i         +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2David Brown
26 May 24 iii  i         i`- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1bart
6 Jun 24 iii  i         `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Thiago Adams
23 May 24 iii  `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Thiago Adams
23 May 24 ii+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions323Keith Thompson
23 May 24 iii+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions313Thiago Adams
23 May 24 iiii`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions312bart
23 May 24 iiii +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions309David Brown
23 May 24 iiii i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions308Keith Thompson
24 May 24 iiii i +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1David Brown
25 May 24 iiii i +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions305Keith Thompson
25 May 24 iiii i i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions304David Brown
26 May 24 iiii i i `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions303Keith Thompson
26 May 24 iiii i i  +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions300David Brown
26 May 24 iiii i i  i+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions17bart
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions16Michael S
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions15bart
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii  `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions14Michael S
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii   +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions3bart
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii   i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Michael S
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii   i `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1bart
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii   +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions5Malcolm McLean
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii   i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions4Michael S
27 May 24 iiii i i  ii   i `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 May 24 iiii i i  ii   i  +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Chris M. Thomasson
27 May 24 iiii i i  ii   i  `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1David Brown
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii   +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Michael S
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii   +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1bart
27 May 24 iiii i i  ii   +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Keith Thompson
27 May 24 iiii i i  ii   `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 May 24 iiii i i  ii    `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Michael S
26 May 24 iiii i i  i+- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Thiago Adams
27 May 24 iiii i i  i+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions66Keith Thompson
27 May 24 iiii i i  ii+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions62David Brown
28 May 24 iiii i i  iii`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions61Keith Thompson
28 May 24 iiii i i  iii `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions60David Brown
28 May 24 iiii i i  iii  `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions59Keith Thompson
28 May 24 iiii i i  iii   +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Michael S
29 May 24 iiii i i  iii   `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions57David Brown
14 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii    `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions56Keith Thompson
15 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions12bart
15 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions11David Brown
15 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions10bart
16 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i  +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i  i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions4bart
16 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i  i +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i  i `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Chris M. Thomasson
17 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i  i  `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i  `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions4David Brown
16 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i   `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions3bart
17 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i    +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1David Brown
17 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i    `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Michael S
15 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions3David Brown
16 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1David Brown
17 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     `* Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)40Keith Thompson
17 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      +* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)20David Brown
18 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      i+* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)18Keith Thompson
18 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii+* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      iii`- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1Keith Thompson
18 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii`* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)15David Brown
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii +* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)6Keith Thompson
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii i`* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)5David Brown
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii i `* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)4Kaz Kylheku
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii i  `* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)3Michael S
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii i   +- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1bart
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii i   `- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1Michael S
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii `* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii  +* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)6David Brown
21 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii  i`* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii  i +* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)3David Brown
22 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii  i i`* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii  i i `- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1David Brown
21 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii  i `- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1James Kuyper
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii  `- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1Keith Thompson
18 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      i`- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      +* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)5Richard Kettlewell
17 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      i+- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1Richard Kettlewell
18 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      i`* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)3Keith Thompson
18 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      i +- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      i `- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1Richard Kettlewell
17 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      `* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)14bart
28 May 24 iiii i i  ii+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Keith Thompson
28 May 24 iiii i i  ii`- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Malcolm McLean
27 May 24 iiii i i  i+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions121Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 May 24 iiii i i  i`* xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions94Michael S
28 May 24 iiii i i  `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Keith Thompson
12 Jun 24 iiii i `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Bonita Montero
23 May 24 iiii `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Keith Thompson
23 May 24 iii+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions7Thiago Adams
23 May 24 iii`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2David Brown
23 May 24 ii`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions6Michael S
23 May 24 i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 May 24 +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions10Malcolm McLean
22 May 24 +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions9Chris M. Thomasson
23 May 24 +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 May 24 +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions14Michael S
23 May 24 +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions - why so conservative?37Michael S
23 May 24 +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions94Bonita Montero
25 May 24 `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Thiago Adams

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal