Sujet : Re: Writing own source disk
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 05. Jun 2024, 10:13:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <v3p6n4$svlf$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2024-06-04 19:57:31 +0000, bart said:
On 04/06/2024 14:40, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> writes:
On 03/06/2024 13:11, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
But from a practical point of view, yes my quine is massively
powerful. Most graphical programs do have images as source. And they just
get zipped up into the FileSystem XML file. So any binary data can be
included. Easily, Using exactly the same system.
I'm not getting it. Why do I want a quine in connection to a graphical
program? I want a way to include everything in the distribution, but
we've had that for ages. Why is having a program that outputs something
you already have (by defintion!) of any use?
My C compiler embeds the the standard headers it uses within the executable. That makes for a tidy, run-anywhere application as it is a single file.
There are not run-anywhere applications. Each computer only runs
applications that are written in a language that it understands.
Many computers only understand one language and no language is
understood by every computer.
-- Mikko
Writing own source disk
Re: Writing own source disk
