Re: Whaddaya think?

On 16.06.2024 09:44, Michael S wrote:

On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:41:12 +0200
Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote:
 

On 16.06.2024 05:26, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:56:49 +0300, Michael S wrote:
 

If you want to preserve you sanity, never use fscanf(). 

>
Quoth the man page <https://manpages.debian.org/3/scanf.3.en.html>:
>
    It is very difficult to use these functions correctly, and it is
    preferable to read entire lines with fgets(3) or getline(3) and
    parse them later with sscanf(3) or more specialized functions
such as strtol(3). 

>
This would be also my first impulse, but you'd have to know
_in advance_ how long the data stream would be; the function
requires an existing buffer.

 
Define formats with sensible maximal line length (512 sounds about
right) and refuse any input that has longer lines.

You're not serious, are you? - Or wasn't it clear that it was
about reading lines (of arbitrary lengths) in one go?

 

So you'd anyway need a stepwise
input. On the plus side there's maybe a better performance
to read large buffer junks and compose them on demand? But
a problem is the potential cut of the string of a number; it
requires additional clumsy handling. So it might anyway be
better (i.e. much more convenient) to use fscanf() ?
>

 
No, the behaviour of fsacnf() is too non-intuitive.

Maybe fsacnf() is non-intuitive.

Myself I've never problems with fscanf(), though. - To each
his own. :-)

Janis