Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?

On 6/22/2024 5:13 AM, Richard Harnden wrote:

On 21/06/2024 22:41, olcott wrote:

On 6/17/2024 9:11 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:

Am 17.06.2024 um 05:47 schrieb olcott:

To understand this analysis requires a sufficient knowledge of
the C programming language and what an x86 emulator does.
>
typedef void (*ptr)();
int H0(ptr P);
>
void Infinite_Loop()
{
   HERE: goto HERE;
}
>
void Infinite_Recursion()
{
   Infinite_Recursion();
}
>
void DDD()
{
   H0(DDD);
   return;
}
>
int main()
{
   H0(Infinite_Loop);
   H0(Infinite_Recursion);
   H0(DDD);
}
>
Every C programmer that knows what an x86 emulator is knows that when H0
emulates the machine language of Infinite_Loop, Infinite_Recursion, and
DDD that it must abort these emulations so that itself can terminate
normally.
>
When this is construed as non-halting criteria then simulating
termination analyzer H0 is correct to reject these inputs as non-
halting.
>
*My POD24 diagnosis is reducing the time I have left to work on this*
Validation of POD24 as a robust early clinical end point of poor
survival in FL from 5225 patients on 13 clinical trials
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34614146/
>

>
Everything correct, no further questions allowed.
>

>
Thanks for your help on this. The Liars on comp.theory are
even lying about what you actually said.
>

 Pretty sure that Bonita was taking the piss.
 

I would say that this would indicate that you are insufficiently
competent with the C programming language.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer