Liste des Groupes | Revenir à cl c |
On 6/22/24 8:42 AM, olcott wrote:It seems pretty stupid to allow gaps in the semantics of C++ programs. Simply specify that the order of evaluation is left to right unless:On 6/22/2024 5:13 AM, Richard Harnden wrote:It seems you are the one that doesn't know the C programing language. After all, you didn't know about the unordering of sub-expressions, or that this can lead to undefined behavior.On 21/06/2024 22:41, olcott wrote:I would say that this would indicate that you are insufficientlyOn 6/17/2024 9:11 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:>Am 17.06.2024 um 05:47 schrieb olcott:>To understand this analysis requires a sufficient knowledge of>
the C programming language and what an x86 emulator does.
>
typedef void (*ptr)();
int H0(ptr P);
>
void Infinite_Loop()
{
HERE: goto HERE;
}
>
void Infinite_Recursion()
{
Infinite_Recursion();
}
>
void DDD()
{
H0(DDD);
return;
}
>
int main()
{
H0(Infinite_Loop);
H0(Infinite_Recursion);
H0(DDD);
}
>
Every C programmer that knows what an x86 emulator is knows that when H0
emulates the machine language of Infinite_Loop, Infinite_Recursion, and
DDD that it must abort these emulations so that itself can terminate
normally.
>
When this is construed as non-halting criteria then simulating
termination analyzer H0 is correct to reject these inputs as non-
halting.
>
*My POD24 diagnosis is reducing the time I have left to work on this*
Validation of POD24 as a robust early clinical end point of poor
survival in FL from 5225 patients on 13 clinical trials
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34614146/
>
Everything correct, no further questions allowed.
>
Thanks for your help on this. The Liars on comp.theory are
even lying about what you actually said.
>
Pretty sure that Bonita was taking the piss.
>
competent with the C programming language.
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.