Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c  
Sujet : Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?
De : Bonita.Montero (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Bonita Montero)
Groupes : comp.lang.c comp.lang.c++
Date : 22. Jun 2024, 19:00:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v573g3$3s8q3$2@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 22.06.2024 um 19:20 schrieb Richard Damon:

C++ made a special rule for the << operator because the gain for its use as an output was high enough, and the cost as a normal shift operator was rarely high (and normally hidden by the "as if" rule) so it was done there.
I guess C++ doesn't make a statement on that and the ordered behaviour
depens in the cascaded return of the stream-object.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Jun 24 * Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?25olcott
17 Jun 24 +* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?23Bonita Montero
17 Jun 24 i+- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1olcott
19 Jun 24 i+- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1olcott
21 Jun 24 i`* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?20olcott
22 Jun 24 i +* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?18Richard Harnden
22 Jun 24 i i`* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?17olcott
22 Jun 24 i i `* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?16Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i i  `* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?15olcott
22 Jun 24 i i   +* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?6Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i i   i`* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?5Bonita Montero
22 Jun 24 i i   i `* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?4Richard Damon
23 Jun 24 i i   i  `* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?3Bonita Montero
23 Jun 24 i i   i   +- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1Richard Damon
23 Jun 24 i i   i   `- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1David Brown
22 Jun 24 i i   +* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?7Bonita Montero
22 Jun 24 i i   i`* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?6Chris M. Thomasson
22 Jun 24 i i   i +* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?3Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i i   i i+- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1Chris M. Thomasson
22 Jun 24 i i   i i`- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1Chris M. Thomasson
22 Jun 24 i i   i +- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1James Kuyper
23 Jun 24 i i   i `- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1David Brown
23 Jun 24 i i   `- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1David Brown
26 Jun 24 i `- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1Bonita Montero
23 Jun 24 `- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal