Re: Whaddaya think?

Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes:
[...]

The misfeature of missing return being success was, I believe, not
intended to make programs shorter. It was intendeda to correct the
random termination statuses of countless numbers of programs in a single
stroke.

Agreed.

Deliberately relying on this in a new program is like relying ona a
diaper. If you're of intermediate age, you don't do this.

No, deliberately relying on this in a new program is like relying on a
language feature that's been clearly specified for the past quarter
century.

If I relied only on language features that I *like*, I wouldn't be able
to write much code.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */