Sujet : Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 03. Jul 2024, 22:04:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240704000437.00005e47@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 18:17:50 +0300
Michael S <
already5chosen@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 20:09:24 +0300
Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> wrote:
As far as I am concerned, the most intriguing feature of tcc is
"Memory and Bound checks". Unfortunately, I was not able to make it
work. It keeps telling me "segmentation error" at first attempt to
dereference argv. Is this feature Linux-only or 32-bit only or some
other type of "only" ?
I tested bound checking on Linux. Here it does not crash. Compilation
is not much slower than without bound checks. Result speed in my tests
was 6-7 times slower than tcc without checks or ~20 times slower than
optimized gcc. I have no idea how this speed impact compares with other
similar tools.
tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain
Re: tcc - first impression. Was: Baby X is bor nagain
