Re: question about nullptr

On 09.07.2024 00:55, Ben Bacarisse wrote:

Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes:
 

On 08.07.2024 18:23, Ben Bacarisse wrote:

Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes:
>

On 08.07.2024 12:18, Ben Bacarisse wrote:

Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes:

>
What's superfluous to one is useful for others (e.g. for grep'ing
occurrences of a null-pointer value in source codes);

>
This is been suggested twice now but I'm struggling to see why that is
useful.  I can see management wanting one to find all uses of a null
pointer constant to check that they have all been replaced by the
"safer" nullptr, but what's the value in searching for nullptr?

>
Bug-tracking.

>
Can you say more?

>
Frankly, no. [...]

 
OK.

So the text you snipped from my reply did not trigger any insight?

Another, last try...
Compare it to 'enum' constants. When I code or debug I want to track
(search and find) them by name not by integer number.
Similar with the 'enum' bool type we introduced (when there was not
yet a bool type existing in C or C++) with literal constants 'true'
and 'false'. (Only two values, but still as important.)
Similar with the dedicated pointer value 0 (these days we used the
literal 'null'). (Only one value, still useful for tracking eq/ne
comparisons and initializations.)

Janis