Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?

bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
[...]

KT has chosen not to answer, and now you are evading it too. I'm
asking why this:
>
     void F(int* B) {}
>
is 'not C' according to KT.

I never said that's "not C".  It is in fact a perfectly valid function
definition.  And it's not the question you originally asked.

[...]

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */