Sujet : Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 06. Aug 2024, 01:34:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v8rr3d$16a8l$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Pan/0.159 (Vovchansk; )
On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 16:35:52 -0000 (UTC), Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Macros done by manipulating strings in a preprocessor are the wrong way
to do them.
The right way to do macros is at the AST level, like Lisp does them.
Standard C preprocessors are already token-based instead of text-based
like prestandard ones were.
Not what I said.
is STC a good supplementary library for C?
Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?