Sujet : Re: multi bytes character - how to make it defined behavior?
De : ben (at) *nospam* bsb.me.uk (Ben Bacarisse)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 14. Aug 2024, 01:32:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <874j7ot04x.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
References : 1
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Thiago Adams <
thiago.adams@gmail.com> writes:
static_assert('×' == 50071);
static_assert(U'×' == 215);
works, but then I don't know what you were trying to do.
GCC - warning multi byte
CLANG - error character too large
>
I think instead of "multi bytes" we need "multi characters" - not
bytes.
>
We decode utf8 then we have the character to decide if it is multi char or
not.
These terms can be confusing and I don't know exactly how you are using
them. Basically I simply don't know what that second sentence is
saying.
decoding '×' would consume bytes 195 and 151 the result is the decoded
Unicode value of 215.
Yes, Unicode 215 is UTF-8 encoded as two bytes with values 195 and 151.
It is not multi byte : 256*195 + 151 = 50071
If that × is UTF-8 encoded then it might look, to the compiler, just
like an old-fashioned multi-character character constant just like 'ab'
does. Then again, it might not. gcc and clan take different views on
the matter.
You can get clang to that the same view a gcc by writing
static_assert('\xC3\x97' == 50071);
instead. Now both gcc and clang see it for what it is: an old-fashioned
multi-character character constant.
O the other hand 'ab' is "multi character" resulting
The term for these things used to be "multi-byte character constant" and
they were highly non-portable. The trouble is that the term "multi-byte
character" now refers to highly portable encodings like UTF-8. Maybe
that's why gcc seems to have changed it's warning from what you gave to:
warning: multi-character character constant [-Wmultichar]
256 * 'a' + 'b' = 256*97+98= 24930
>
One consequence is that
>
'ab' == '𤤰'
>
But I don't think this is a problem. At least everything is defined.
>
-- Ben.