Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere

fir wrote:

Thiago Adams wrote:

initializer inside if is already in C++, and it will probably be on C2Y.
>

>
can you show an example how it look like?
>
what with definition in espression liek
>
foo((int a=2*int b=10) etc
>
It loks weird but I also COME TO CONCLUSION TODAY
THAT in new language we must drop the "pure text" text set
we need bold and possibly loloristation so instead
>
int x = 2
>
you could just bold x and  write =2
>
bold x = 2
>
and simply bold mean symbol definition
>
this opens a new wariety of nice code looking,
by colorisation some coud differentiate if it is int or float
etc
>

i mean i thinked a lot how it make look good old way but after real doze
of thinking my conclusion would be all is worse than simply adding at least text bolding