Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c  
Sujet : Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere
De : Keith.S.Thompson+u (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Keith Thompson)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 28. Aug 2024, 03:23:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None to speak of
Message-ID : <87ed69crn5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
[...]
Not exactly.  There are things that can be done inside a
statement-expression that are not available inside nested
functions or lambdas.

And you're not going to tell us what those things are.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Aug 24 * on allowing "int a" definition everywhere62fir
20 Aug 24 +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere24Thiago Adams
20 Aug 24 i+* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere4fir
20 Aug 24 ii+- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1fir
20 Aug 24 ii`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2Thiago Adams
20 Aug 24 ii `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1fir
21 Aug 24 i`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere19Blue-Maned_Hawk
21 Aug 24 i `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere18Thiago Adams
21 Aug 24 i  +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere4Bart
21 Aug 24 i  i`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere3Thiago Adams
21 Aug 24 i  i `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2Michael S
21 Aug 24 i  i  `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Thiago Adams
22 Aug 24 i  `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere13Blue-Maned_Hawk
22 Aug 24 i   +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere5Keith Thompson
22 Aug 24 i   i`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere4Ben Bacarisse
22 Aug 24 i   i +- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Keith Thompson
22 Aug 24 i   i `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2Kaz Kylheku
23 Aug 24 i   i  `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Ben Bacarisse
22 Aug 24 i   `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere7Bart
22 Aug 24 i    +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2Thiago Adams
22 Aug 24 i    i`- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Blue-Maned_Hawk
23 Aug 24 i    `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere4fir
23 Aug 24 i     `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere3Bart
23 Aug 24 i      `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2fir
23 Aug 24 i       `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1fir
21 Aug 24 `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere37Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Aug 24  +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2Ben Bacarisse
21 Aug 24  i`- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Ben Bacarisse
25 Aug 24  `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere34fir
27 Aug 24   `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere33Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Aug 24    +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere21fir
27 Aug 24    i`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere20fir
27 Aug 24    i `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere19fir
27 Aug 24    i  +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere3fir
27 Aug 24    i  i`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2fir
27 Aug 24    i  i `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1fir
27 Aug 24    i  `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere15fir
27 Aug 24    i   +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere13fir
27 Aug 24    i   i+* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere9Bart
27 Aug 24    i   ii+* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere3fir
27 Aug 24    i   iii`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2fir
27 Aug 24    i   iii `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1fir
2 Sep 24    i   ii`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Sep 24    i   ii `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere4Bart
3 Sep 24    i   ii  `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Sep 24    i   ii   +- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Kaz Kylheku
3 Sep 24    i   ii   `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Michael S
27 Aug 24    i   i`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere3fir
29 Aug 24    i   i `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2fir
29 Aug 24    i   i  `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1fir
3 Sep 24    i   `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Aug 24    `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere11Blue-Maned_Hawk
28 Aug 24     `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere10Tim Rentsch
28 Aug 24      `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere9Keith Thompson
28 Aug 24       +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2Ben Bacarisse
28 Aug 24       i`- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Tim Rentsch
28 Aug 24       +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2Tim Rentsch
28 Aug 24       i`- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Keith Thompson
28 Aug 24       `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere4Tim Rentsch
28 Aug 24        +- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1David Brown
28 Aug 24        +- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1James Kuyper
28 Aug 24        `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal