Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere

Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:

Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
[...]
>

Not exactly.  There are things that can be done inside a
statement-expression that are not available inside nested
functions or lambdas.

>
And you're not going to tell us what those things are.

As a rule I don't have a lot of sympathy for people who are
too lazy to think for themselves.  I'm sorry to say that
class includes you a lot more often than would appear to be
warrented.