Sujet : Re: Other programming languages (Was: Command line globber/tokenizer library for C?)
De : jameskuyper (at) *nospam* alumni.caltech.edu (James Kuyper)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 12. Sep 2024, 23:50:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vbvr73$fdts$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/12/24 18:32, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:40:17 +0200, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
A lot of early C++ programs I've seen were just, umm, "enhanced" "C"
programs.
Given that C++ makes “virtual” optional instead of standard behaviour, I’d
say that C++ is in fact designed to be used that way.
Like many other aspects of C++, that was dictated by a necessity of
remaining a certain minimum level of backwards compatibility with
existing C code. You shouldn't draw any larger conclusions from that choice.