Liste des Groupes | Revenir à cl c |
Bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
>And yes I'm still committed to that symmetry. I'ved used it for countless>
language implementations. C is little different other than it has a
700-page standard that suggests a recommended model of how it's supposed to
work.
>
You can't really use that to bash me about the head with and maintain that
all my ideas about language implementation are wrong because C views
assignment in its own idiosyncratic manner.
I don't want to bash you about the head, but what C says about
assignment has /always/ been the point, and your implementation of C
will be wrong if you don't follow the rules about C's assignments. You
/know/ the LH and RH side of a C assignment have different constraints
(you have said so yourself) yet you persist in defending your original
claim that what is needed on the two sides "is exactly the same". You
must, surely, be arguing simply for the fun of it.
>
Tim suggests that there is communication failure here -- that you have
not expressed what you mean clearly enough. That may be so, but I can't
see how to interpret what you've written in any other way.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.