Sujet : Re: [stats]Frequent Numbers
De : jameskuyper (at) *nospam* alumni.caltech.edu (James Kuyper)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 29. Sep 2024, 01:34:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vda7bh$1euoo$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/28/24 14:16, Stefan Ram wrote:
Which parts of the standard(s) are quoted often in this newsgroup?
>
Here are some candidates (numbers with other meanings might have
sneaked in!) I found with their frequency:
>
number frequency
>
9.10 617
There is no section 9 in the ISO C standard.
2.6.39.3 615
Section 2 has no sub-sections, just paragraphs.
1.0 491
Section 1 also has no sub-sections, and (oddly for a language that uses
0-based indexing :-) sub-sections are never numbered 0.
6.2.5 389
That's the section for types - that's plausibly a common topic of
discussion.
Several of the following section numbers listed below fall afoul of the
same issues as the first three, but I'll stop here.
6.3.2.3 351
1.6 349
5.1.2.3 347
6.3.2.1 292
1.48.0 265
6.2.6.2 257
6.5p7 232
6.5.2.2 228
6.2.6.1 220
5.1.2.2.1 198
6.5.6 196
3.4.5 185
6.7.8 181
4.7.4 175
3.2.3 158
7.1.4 157
5.2.4.1 155
6.7.2.1 155
2.0 153
7.1.3 153
4.1.2 153
6.5.3.2 144
3.4.3 141
2.7 136
6.5.2.3 127
5.2.4.2.2 124
6.3.1.1 121
6.2.4 120
6.5.16.1 116
6.7.3 115
6.5.3.4 114
3.2.2 113
5.2.1 113
5.1.0 113
4.1.1 112
4.3.3 111
6.5.7 110
7.20.3 108
3.4.4 107
5.4.6 107
6.3.2.3p7 105
6.2.1 102
5.1.1.2 102
6.2.6 101
6.3.1.8 101
3.4.6 101
3.0 100
>
>