Re: constexpr keyword is unnecessary

On 13.10.2024 15:47, Bonita Montero wrote:

Am 13.10.2024 um 15:35 schrieb Janis Papanagnou:
 

On 13.10.2024 15:14, Bonita Montero wrote:

It can be understood in 10s.

 

I doubt that. - ...

 
LOL
 

What do I (in my role as a solution programmer) gain from it?

 
More expressive code.
 

This is not the least convincing. Since you seem to express only a
language/compiler-internal theme, not any application programmers'
demand.

Regarding "expressiveness" (on the programmer's level) the OP's
suggestion (to use "const") is fine already, and probably better
than introducing a new keyword thus (unnecessarily?) complicating
the matter. - That's why I (honestly) asked for a concrete gain,
to understand whether it's maybe necessary for reasons that are
not yet obvious (to me).

But I take your elusion concerning my question as a meta-answer
that there is no gain. So don't bother.

Janis