Re: constexpr keyword is unnecessary

Am 13.10.2024 um 17:03 schrieb Janis Papanagnou:

For me, writing  int i = 0;  and  const int i = 0;  is perfectly
readable, and (unnecessarily!) adding another keyword degrades
readability.

The difference is that for local variable const can be overridden
since this const is only logical constness but not physical const-
ness. This minimalist mindset is simply no longer up to date and,
considering the simplicity of the feature, simply absurd.