Sujet : Re: c initialization algorithm
De : thiago.adams (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Thiago Adams)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 15. Oct 2024, 12:12:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <velin3$1m8c1$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 14/10/2024 08:14, Thiago Adams wrote:
On 14/10/2024 02:00, Tim Rentsch wrote:
Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes:
>
On 2024-10-13, Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> wrote:
>
The algorithm for C initialization as described in the standard
and implemented in gcc allow this.
>
struct X{
int a,b,c;
};
>
int main()
{
struct X x = {.a=1,2,3,.a=1, 2, 3};
}
>
https://godbolt.org/z/7naedbEM6
>
Basically, when a designed initializer is found the "cursor" goes
to that member and the following members are initialized in
order.
>
I do not suspect that therw is an observable order. I.e. as
in a required order considered observable behavior.
>
Have you checked to C standard to see what it says about that?
I'm not only interested in this part, but since it raised some doubts, I decided to do some checks
#include <stdio.h>
struct X {
int i;
};
int f() {
printf("f");
return 1;
}
int main() {
struct X x = {.i = f(), .i = f() };
}
https://godbolt.org/z/rf984cGMMThere is a warning in this sample and f is called just once.