Re: constexpr keyword is unnecessary

On 15.10.2024 22:31, Kaz Kylheku wrote:

 
C++ standard libraries are such shit that it's standard practice
for any organization to to have its own locally developed libraries.

What's your problem with it? (I mean; given that you're just cussing.)

Personally I started coding C++ in professional contexts before STL
was available, let alone in a standardized way; each Unix context had
its own quirks using the first predecessors of the standard STL. It
was really overdue that it got available and standardized.

Concerning the library itself its concepts were outstanding. (Other
libraries in other languages often gave the impression of a loosely
mixed set of ad hoc elements.)

I can see a point that it may be considered difficult to find one's
way into understanding it, especially for folks who don't read the
docs and just try to use them unprepared.

Janis