Re: constexpr keyword is unnecessary

David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
[...]

I know there are compilers that don't support VLAs at all - that's
fair enough (and that's why I specifically mentioned it).  We can
expect that compilers that can't handle VLAs at all will not support
C23 constexpr, or any suggested C++ style extensions to the semantics
of "const".

Why would we expect that?

IIRC, Microsoft has decided not to support VLAs in its C compiler.  If
they chose not to support constexpr, they could not claim C23 conformance.

[...]

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */