Sujet : Re: ChatGPT explains why rebuttals of my work are incorrect
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 21. Oct 2024, 04:30:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vf4hrq$pljj$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/14/2024 5:17 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 10/13/2024 7:57 PM, olcott wrote:
On 10/13/2024 11:34 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
On 2024-10-12, Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/12/2024 11:28 AM, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
On 12.10.2024 11:32, Jan van den Broek wrote:
2024-10-12, Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> schrieb:
On 10/11/2024 7:50 PM, olcott wrote:
>
[Schnipp]
>
As I see it, the main Halting Problem is Olcott not halting.
>
LOL! - A very nice one. Thanks for that. :-)
>
I second that. :^)
>
You're likely thousand-seconding that. The Olcott not halting joke
is many years old now, and will likely come up again.
>
>
>
My cancer has gotten worse.
>
*ChatGPT explains why rebuttals of my work are incorrect*
https://chatgpt.com/share/6709e046-4794-8011-98b7-27066fb49f3e
>
I had to dumb this down from the original halting problem
input so that reviewers can verify that HHH is correct
without hardly paying any attention at all:
>
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
>
When HHH is an x86 emulation based termination analyzer
then each DDD emulated by any HHH that it calls never returns.
[...]
Isn't that similar to:
void foobar()
{
foobar();
}
?
void Infinite_Recursion()
{
Infinite_Recursion();
OutputString("Can't possibly get here!");
}
of line 1332 of this file
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.cis one of the sample inputs that HHH correctly reports.
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utmhttps://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/x86utm.sln-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
ChatGPT explains why by rebuttal of the halting problem proofs is correct
Re: ChatGPT explains why rebuttals of my work are incorrect