Re: constexpr keyword is unnecessary

On 22/10/2024 05:02, Bonita Montero wrote:

Am 20.10.2024 um 14:22 schrieb Thiago Adams:
 

//'constexpr' initializer not representable in type of object
constexpr unsigned char c= 1234;
with const it is a warning. ...

 Good that we have constexpr now.
 

I think a more generic feature would be to have a standard way of promoting selected warnings to errors. This would avoid stacking features with small differences, such as treating constexpr as a special case compared to other constant expressions in C.