Re: is double slower?

fir wrote:

this just draws something like little light that darkens as 1/(r*r*r)
and is able to add n-lights in place to mix colors end eventually
"overlight" (so this is kinda blending)
>
its very time consuming liek draving 100 of them (rhen r is 9) was
taking 35 ms on old machine afair)

right now i cant do test (must work on some other problems) of it but my previous faith like float is never slower possibly is being like under question