Re: on named blocks concept

if c would have something that i name as named block
much more interesting options in coding in c would be
imo avaliable..
by named block i understood something like
 foo {
   //code here
}
 whiuch resembles function , as can be placed in 'global'
(module level) space but also could be placed locally in
functions
 int foo() {
   a { }
   b { }
}
 then it could be called internally
 int foo() {
   a { }
   b { }
    int x = a()*a()*b(); //though imo () probab;ly should be optionall
}
 or externally
 foo.a()
 those blocks probably should have acces to local variables of
parent functions or parant block so it yelds imo to conclusion
that local variables and arguments should be by default static
(those stack variables by default are bad idea imo.. its kinda optimisation
needed whan you got 4kb RAM but on bigger machines this optimisation is bad imo)
 if so mant things can be done with this blocks probably, im not exactly
sure what exactly
 ona assembly label blocks by defauld probably be done by
 name:
   //...
   ret
   so then can be reused though some version to call it in place
  of definitions could be also avaliable imo (something like
  a{}() in a sense but better looking (this looks to bad)
   overally those named block should be also united with function
  so they become the same if use on them the functionality of
  passing arguments and returning variables
   foo {
    a {}
     int x, y = a(1,2)
  }
   though i maybe not sure how to add this mechanism
  possibly som,ething liek this (until something better could be found)
   a
  {
   in int c;
   in int d;
   out int x = c+d;
   out int y = c-d;
  }
   or
  a( int c, int d)
  {
   out int x = c+d;
   out int y = c-d;
  }
 as all c d x y are static you may call a() without any or
with any set int x, y = a(1) int x = a(1,2) and compiler
would generate the assigments (how to call it on assembly level us
wuite clear, not fully clear is what syntax in language to use
 this concept is yet not fully build yet but what i descrbed her i guess is okay