Re: on named blocks concept

fir wrote:

Bonita Montero wrote:

Am 06.11.2024 um 20:46 schrieb fir:
>

a {}
b{ }
c{}
>
int x = a*b+c;
>
where a,b,c are blocks of code (though here it would probably mean
"run a" get value and mul by "run b" take value , tun c and add

>
Use C++ and lambdas.

>
c++ has so many structural errors it makes it sh*t
(overaly all c++ is structural errors .. prbably one and only
thing interesting in c++ is operator overloading but it also is badly
done ofc)
>

besides you could do more than this lambda does , i guess
(i dont quite remember what this lambda is)
like some can define operators on this blocks for more than arithmetic on return values
like this "inject " a<-b
a is called and it cals b from inside
b {beep();}
a(block f) {
   for(int i=0; i<10; i++) f()
}
or something more complex in this spirit (i dont know what hoveve)
maybe also thiose blocks simply could be used to allow code be shorter, i dont know