Re: on named blocks concept

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c  
Sujet : Re: on named blocks concept
De : fir (at) *nospam* grunge.pl (fir)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 08. Nov 2024, 18:55:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <8893fff4c1f1fc4828b02e0cef1f33c824dee3f4@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 SeaMonkey/2.24
Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 08.11.2024 um 16:58 schrieb fir:
>
possibly if you woild write it - if you think writing on c is buffer
overflow for you
C is not suitable for business applications. With that you don't need
that much control over technical details and half the performacne is
sufficient. In C you'd write ten times the code and the code is much
more error-prone.
>
well first of all i was not saying c is suitable for business aplication
i dont know
it is just pssible that companies can only hire idiots and idiots may noy be good in c etc
what i was sayin that c++ has terroble structural errors
(yet to say big prgrams like windows linux wa swritten in c so that is kinda proof etc, but i dont want to talk this kind of idiotic konversatiion when yoy belive something and will repeat it to me
on and on as usual...
in fact youre not c coder on c group and you share you opinions not javing experience in c coding against people who can code in c and know
how it is going)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Nov 24 * on named blocks concept31fir
6 Nov 24 `* Re: on named blocks concept30Thiago Adams
6 Nov 24  `* Re: on named blocks concept29Thiago Adams
6 Nov 24   +- Re: on named blocks concept1fir
6 Nov 24   `* Re: on named blocks concept27fir
6 Nov 24    +* Re: on named blocks concept5Thiago Adams
6 Nov 24    i`* Re: on named blocks concept4fir
6 Nov 24    i `* Re: on named blocks concept3Bart
7 Nov 24    i  `* Re: on named blocks concept2fir
7 Nov 24    i   `- Re: on named blocks concept1fir
7 Nov 24    `* Re: on named blocks concept21Bonita Montero
7 Nov 24     `* Re: on named blocks concept20fir
7 Nov 24      +* Re: on named blocks concept18Bonita Montero
7 Nov 24      i`* Re: on named blocks concept17fir
7 Nov 24      i `* Re: on named blocks concept16Bonita Montero
7 Nov 24      i  `* Re: on named blocks concept15fir
7 Nov 24      i   +- Re: on named blocks concept1fir
7 Nov 24      i   `* Re: on named blocks concept13Bonita Montero
7 Nov 24      i    +* Re: on named blocks concept10fir
7 Nov 24      i    i`* Re: on named blocks concept9Bonita Montero
7 Nov 24      i    i `* Re: on named blocks concept8fir
8 Nov 24      i    i  `* Re: on named blocks concept7Bonita Montero
8 Nov 24      i    i   `* Re: on named blocks concept6fir
8 Nov 24      i    i    `* Re: on named blocks concept5Bonita Montero
8 Nov 24      i    i     `* Re: on named blocks concept4fir
8 Nov 24      i    i      `* Re: on named blocks concept3Bonita Montero
9 Nov 24      i    i       `* Re: on named blocks concept2fir
9 Nov 24      i    i        `- Re: on named blocks concept1Bonita Montero
10 Nov 24      i    `* Re: on named blocks concept2Janis Papanagnou
13 Nov 24      i     `- Re: on named blocks concept1fir
7 Nov 24      `- Re: on named blocks concept1fir

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal