Sujet : Re: best approach for multithreading (?)
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 06. Dec 2024, 21:14:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vivlum$2his5$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/5/2024 4:09 PM, James Kuyper wrote:
On 12/3/24 12:48, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
...
Think about it. The POSIX standard includes ISO C by reference.
So that means POSIX has to have two thread libraries.
It's a waste of flash in embedded systems.
C <threads.h> can be implemented as a thin wrapper over POSIX threads.
The waste is relatively negligible. The differences, were intended to
allow <threads.h> to also be implemented on non-POSIX systems as
wrappers for whatever the native threading system was.
Actually that reminds me of an older little "thing" I did when I had nothing to do:
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.c/c/WPH7ed5uS4Y;^)
best approach for multithreading (?)
Re: best approach for multithreading (?)