Re: question about linker

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c  
Sujet : Re: question about linker
De : david.brown (at) *nospam* hesbynett.no (David Brown)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 07. Dec 2024, 18:58:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vj22ce$37g4b$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 07/12/2024 17:52, Bart wrote:
On 07/12/2024 15:57, David Brown wrote:
On 06/12/2024 19:41, Bart wrote:
 
My language:
>
   println =a,=b                  # 13 characters, 0 shifted
>
>
Since some of us live in a world with more than one person - indeed, more than one country - you might like to know that "=" is shifted on many keyboards.
 I want to make my comment both fit on one line, and line up with the other, so I had to leave out '(on my keyword)'. I'd hoped that was implied.
Sure.  I just thought you'd like to know that when you make comparisons like this, you do so more subjectively than you might have imagined.

 
>
(And that space is optional!)
>
The biggest irritation I have with your style, whether in your language or in C, is the lack of space.  It's a big key - it's easy to press.
 Spaces were left out to do a fairer comparison. Spaces aren't a big deal, they are fairly easy to type, I even left one in in my example because it looked too odd otherwise, and I was still ahead anyway.
 
Spaces /are/ a big deal.

Good spacing habits (in the broadest sense) is the single biggest factor to readability of code, text, hand-writing, and pretty much anything else.
>
The language Forth is not known for being easy to read amongst non- experts, but one thing it gets right is insisting that there are spaces between tokens.
 That is misleading. Forth REQUIRES those spaces otherwise it wouldn't work; each line would be read as one giant token. It's not because it wants to instill good habits.
 
That's fair.  But the result is better spacing, even if it is a by-product.

If you wrote C in the same style, it would look pretty weird:
Forth doesn't need the parentheses or the semicolons, making it a bit of an unfair comparison.

     f ( ) ;
    f ( x , y , z ) ;
    ++ p . x ;
    q = ( void ) p ;
    label :
    f ( x , y , z ) ;
    a [ i + 1 ] ;
 
That is just differently bad from "f(x,y,z);" and "q=(void*)p;".  Too much space is bad spacing, just as too little space is bad spacing (and so is inconsistent spacing).

 I know this won't cut any ice, as nothing I can possibly write will ever make the slightest bit of difference, but in C you write stuff like this:
No, in C /I/ don't write anything of the sort - nor do most C programmers.  And I don't believe you write functions with 8 parameters in your language either.  At the very least, these would be highly unusual.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Nov 24 * question about linker382Thiago Adams
26 Nov 24 +* Re: question about linker16Thiago Adams
26 Nov 24 i`* Re: question about linker15Bart
26 Nov 24 i `* Re: question about linker14Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i  +* Re: question about linker2BGB
27 Nov 24 i  i`- Re: question about linker1Bart
27 Nov 24 i  +* Re: question about linker5David Brown
27 Nov 24 i  i`* Re: question about linker4Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i  i +* Re: question about linker2David Brown
27 Nov 24 i  i i`- Re: question about linker1Thiago Adams
2 Dec 24 i  i `- Re: question about linker1BGB
27 Nov 24 i  `* Re: question about linker6Michael S
27 Nov 24 i   `* Re: question about linker5Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i    `* Re: question about linker4Michael S
27 Nov 24 i     +- Re: question about linker1David Brown
28 Nov 24 i     +- Re: question about linker1Tim Rentsch
2 Dec 24 i     `- Re: question about linker1BGB
26 Nov 24 +* Re: question about linker20Bart
26 Nov 24 i`* Re: question about linker19Thiago Adams
26 Nov 24 i `* Re: question about linker18Bart
27 Nov 24 i  +* Re: question about linker3BGB
27 Nov 24 i  i`* Re: question about linker2fir
27 Nov 24 i  i `- Re: question about linker1BGB
27 Nov 24 i  `* Re: question about linker14Bart
27 Nov 24 i   +* Re: question about linker12Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i+- Re: question about linker1Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i`* Re: question about linker10Bart
27 Nov 24 i   i +* Re: question about linker6Bart
27 Nov 24 i   i i`* Re: question about linker5Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i i +* Re: question about linker3Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i i i`* Re: question about linker2Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i i i `- Re: question about linker1Bart
27 Nov 24 i   i i `- Re: question about linker1Bart
27 Nov 24 i   i `* Re: question about linker3Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i  `* Re: question about linker2Bart
27 Nov 24 i   i   `- Re: question about linker1Thiago Adams
28 Nov 24 i   `- Re: question about linker1Tim Rentsch
27 Nov 24 `* Re: question about linker345Waldek Hebisch
27 Nov 24  `* Re: question about linker344Thiago Adams
28 Nov 24   `* Re: question about linker343Keith Thompson
28 Nov 24    `* Re: question about linker342Thiago Adams
28 Nov 24     +* Re: question about linker337Bart
28 Nov 24     i`* Re: question about linker336Keith Thompson
29 Nov 24     i `* Re: question about linker335Bart
29 Nov 24     i  `* Re: question about linker334Keith Thompson
29 Nov 24     i   `* Re: question about linker333Bart
29 Nov 24     i    +* Re: question about linker3Keith Thompson
29 Nov 24     i    i`* Re: question about linker2Bart
29 Nov 24     i    i `- Re: question about linker1Keith Thompson
29 Nov 24     i    `* Re: question about linker329David Brown
29 Nov 24     i     `* Re: question about linker328Bart
29 Nov 24     i      +- Re: question about linker1Ike Naar
29 Nov 24     i      +* Re: question about linker325Michael S
29 Nov 24     i      i+* Re: question about linker322Bart
29 Nov 24     i      ii`* Re: question about linker321Michael S
29 Nov 24     i      ii +* Re: question about linker319David Brown
29 Nov 24     i      ii i`* Re: question about linker318Bart
29 Nov 24     i      ii i +* Re: question about linker164Keith Thompson
29 Nov 24     i      ii i i`* Re: question about linker163Bart
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i `* Re: question about linker162Keith Thompson
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  +* Re: question about linker95Waldek Hebisch
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  i+- Re: question about linker1Keith Thompson
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  i+* Re: question about linker3James Kuyper
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  ii`* Re: question about linker2Michael S
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  ii `- Re: question about linker1Tim Rentsch
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i`* Re: question about linker90David Brown
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i +* Re: question about linker88Bart
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i`* Re: question about linker87David Brown
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i `* Re: question about linker86Bart
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i  `* Re: question about linker85David Brown
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i   `* Re: question about linker84Bart
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    +* Re: question about linker78David Brown
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    i+* Re: question about linker72Janis Papanagnou
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    ii+* Re: question about linker70Bart
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iii+* Re: question about linker68David Brown
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii`* Re: question about linker67Bart
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii `* Re: question about linker66David Brown
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  +* Re: question about linker53Bart
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i`* Re: question about linker52David Brown
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i `* Re: question about linker51Bart
4 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i  `* Re: question about linker50David Brown
4 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i   `* Re: question about linker49Bart
4 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i    `* Re: question about linker48David Brown
4 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     +* Re: question about linker24Bart
5 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i`* Re: question about linker23David Brown
5 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i +- Re: question about linker1Janis Papanagnou
5 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i `* Re: question about linker21Bart
6 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i  `* Re: question about linker20David Brown
6 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i   `* Re: question about linker19Bart
6 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    +* Re: question about linker5Ike Naar
6 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i+- Re: question about linker1Bart
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i+- Re: question about linker1Keith Thompson
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i`* Re: question about linker2Bart
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i `- Re: question about linker1Keith Thompson
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    +* Re: question about linker10David Brown
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i`* Re: question about linker9Bart
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i `* Re: question about linker8David Brown
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i  `* Re: question about linker7Bart
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i   `* Re: question about linker6David Brown
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i    `* Re: question about linker5Bart
8 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i     +* Re: question about linker3Ben Bacarisse
8 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i     `- Re: question about linker1David Brown
8 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    `* Re: question about linker3Waldek Hebisch
5 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     +* Re: question about linker15Waldek Hebisch
11 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     `* Re: question about linker8James Kuyper
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  `* Re: question about linker12Bart
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iii`- Re: question about linker1Janis Papanagnou
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    ii`- Re: question about linker1Bart
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    i`* Re: question about linker5Bart
4 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    `* Re: question about linker5Waldek Hebisch
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i `- Re: question about linker1Janis Papanagnou
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  +* Re: question about linker44Bart
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  +- Re: question about linker1Janis Papanagnou
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  `* Re: question about linker21David Brown
30 Nov 24     i      ii i `* Re: question about linker153David Brown
5 Dec 24     i      ii `- Re: question about linker1Tim Rentsch
30 Nov 24     i      i`* Re: question about linker2Tim Rentsch
29 Nov 24     i      `- Re: question about linker1David Brown
28 Nov 24     `* Re: question about linker4Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal