Re: transpiling to low level C

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c  
Sujet : Re: transpiling to low level C
De : thiago.adams (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Thiago Adams)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 15. Dec 2024, 12:46:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vjmfht$hhg1$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Em 12/15/2024 8:28 AM, bart escreveu:
On 15/12/2024 03:05, Thiago Adams wrote:
>
I am working on a C backend that generates simple C code.
>
You can test it here:
http://thradams.com/cake/playground.html
>
Objective
- Shift all the complexity of the C compiler to the frontend.
   Why? This approach simplifies having one frontend and multiple backends.
- Use C as an intermediate language to feed a backend (any C compiler can act as the backend).
   The backend can then focus solely on code generation.
- Code is not portable
>
Removed C89 Features
- Preprocessor
- sizeof
 If I try:
      printf("%zu\n", sizeof(void*));
 it turns into:
      printf("%zu\n", 4U);
 Presumably this translator will only target 32-bit systems even if run on a 64-bit one?
 
It will have to be configured to x86 or x64. It has to match the target/platform compiler settings. The online versions is emulating something. I think x86 gcc on linux.

(My own C transpiler goes the other way and generates 'C64', requiring a 64-bit compiler. Earlier versions made it optional, but the output was then either C32 or C64; if someone else compiled it, they'd have to choose the right compiler option.)
 I don't know if that "%zu" format will be an issue.
 
It has to generate code as the target compiler wants to see. I am removing sizeof for instance, then sizeof computed must match the target compiler.

 
- typedef
- enum
- Constant expressions (the final result is precomputed during earlier stages)
- const
- I may also remove switch.
 You can do that. But it can also slow down certain programs. (TCC 0.9.26 generated seqential tests for switch, but on one benchmark that relied on it heavily, its code was slower than my dynamic interpreter.)
 
I want to move this to the front end.

If you think this might be too hard to compile later, you can choose to do the same. (As for parsing switch, you'd need to do that anyway, either in the transpiler, or the backend compiler.)
 >
>
Initialization also needs a strategy. I want to move these to front end.
The problem is if that strategy cannot be implemented in C89.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Dec 24 * transpiling to low level C130Thiago Adams
15 Dec 24 +* Re: transpiling to low level C10Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Dec 24 i`* Re: transpiling to low level C9Thiago Adams
15 Dec 24 i `* Re: transpiling to low level C8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Dec 24 i  `* Re: transpiling to low level C7Thiago Adams
16 Dec 24 i   `* Re: transpiling to low level C6BGB
16 Dec 24 i    +- Re: transpiling to low level C1Thiago Adams
16 Dec 24 i    +- Re: transpiling to low level C1bart
16 Dec 24 i    +- Re: transpiling to low level C1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Dec 24 i    `* Re: transpiling to low level C2Keith Thompson
17 Dec 24 i     `- Re: transpiling to low level C1bart
15 Dec 24 +* Re: transpiling to low level C3Chris M. Thomasson
15 Dec 24 i`* Re: transpiling to low level C2Thiago Adams
15 Dec 24 i `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Chris M. Thomasson
15 Dec 24 +* Re: transpiling to low level C3bart
15 Dec 24 i`* Re: transpiling to low level C2Thiago Adams
15 Dec 24 i `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Thiago Adams
15 Dec 24 `* Re: transpiling to low level C113Bonita Montero
15 Dec 24  +* Re: transpiling to low level C110bart
16 Dec 24  i`* Re: transpiling to low level C109BGB
16 Dec 24  i +- Re: transpiling to low level C1David Brown
16 Dec 24  i +* Re: transpiling to low level C22Thiago Adams
17 Dec 24  i i`* Re: transpiling to low level C21BGB
17 Dec 24  i i `* Re: transpiling to low level C20Thiago Adams
17 Dec 24  i i  +* Re: transpiling to low level C15Thiago Adams
17 Dec 24  i i  i`* Re: transpiling to low level C14Thiago Adams
17 Dec 24  i i  i `* Re: transpiling to low level C13bart
17 Dec 24  i i  i  `* Re: transpiling to low level C12Thiago Adams
17 Dec 24  i i  i   `* Re: transpiling to low level C11bart
18 Dec 24  i i  i    `* Re: transpiling to low level C10BGB
18 Dec 24  i i  i     `* Re: transpiling to low level C9Thiago Adams
19 Dec 24  i i  i      `* Re: transpiling to low level C8BGB
19 Dec 24  i i  i       `* Re: transpiling to low level C7bart
19 Dec 24  i i  i        `* Re: transpiling to low level C6BGB
19 Dec 24  i i  i         +* Re: transpiling to low level C3bart
19 Dec 24  i i  i         i`* Re: transpiling to low level C2BGB
20 Dec 24  i i  i         i `- Re: transpiling to low level C1BGB
23 Dec 24  i i  i         `* Re: transpiling to low level C2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Dec 24  i i  i          `- Re: transpiling to low level C1BGB
17 Dec 24  i i  `* Re: transpiling to low level C4BGB
17 Dec 24  i i   +* Re: transpiling to low level C2Thiago Adams
18 Dec 24  i i   i`- Re: transpiling to low level C1BGB
21 Dec 24  i i   `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Dec 24  i +* Re: transpiling to low level C72Janis Papanagnou
16 Dec 24  i i+* Re: transpiling to low level C16bart
16 Dec 24  i ii`* Re: transpiling to low level C15Janis Papanagnou
17 Dec 24  i ii `* Re: transpiling to low level C14bart
17 Dec 24  i ii  +* Re: transpiling to low level C12Keith Thompson
17 Dec 24  i ii  i+- Re: transpiling to low level C1BGB
17 Dec 24  i ii  i`* Re: transpiling to low level C10bart
17 Dec 24  i ii  i +- Re: transpiling to low level C1Janis Papanagnou
17 Dec 24  i ii  i +* Re: transpiling to low level C6Waldek Hebisch
17 Dec 24  i ii  i i+* Re: transpiling to low level C4bart
18 Dec 24  i ii  i ii`* Re: transpiling to low level C3Waldek Hebisch
18 Dec 24  i ii  i ii `* Re: transpiling to low level C2bart
18 Dec 24  i ii  i ii  `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Waldek Hebisch
18 Dec 24  i ii  i i`- Re: transpiling to low level C1Janis Papanagnou
17 Dec 24  i ii  i `* Re: transpiling to low level C2Keith Thompson
18 Dec 24  i ii  i  `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Janis Papanagnou
17 Dec 24  i ii  `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Janis Papanagnou
21 Dec 24  i i`* Re: transpiling to low level C55Tim Rentsch
21 Dec 24  i i `* Re: transpiling to low level C54Janis Papanagnou
21 Dec 24  i i  +* Re: transpiling to low level C2Tim Rentsch
22 Dec 24  i i  i`- Re: transpiling to low level C1Janis Papanagnou
21 Dec 24  i i  +* Re: transpiling to low level C18Michael S
22 Dec 24  i i  i+* Re: transpiling to low level C14Janis Papanagnou
22 Dec 24  i i  ii`* Re: transpiling to low level C13Michael S
22 Dec 24  i i  ii `* Re: transpiling to low level C12Janis Papanagnou
22 Dec 24  i i  ii  `* Re: transpiling to low level C11Michael S
22 Dec 24  i i  ii   +* Re: transpiling to low level C8Janis Papanagnou
23 Dec 24  i i  ii   i`* Re: transpiling to low level C7Tim Rentsch
23 Dec 24  i i  ii   i `* Re: transpiling to low level C6Waldek Hebisch
23 Dec 24  i i  ii   i  +* Re: transpiling to low level C3David Brown
25 Dec 24  i i  ii   i  i`* Re: transpiling to low level C2BGB
28 Dec 24  i i  ii   i  i `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Tim Rentsch
4 Jan21:12  i i  ii   i  `* Re: transpiling to low level C2Tim Rentsch
4 Jan21:53  i i  ii   i   `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Chris M. Thomasson
22 Dec 24  i i  ii   `* Re: transpiling to low level C2James Kuyper
22 Dec 24  i i  ii    `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Janis Papanagnou
23 Dec 24  i i  i`* Re: transpiling to low level C3Tim Rentsch
23 Dec 24  i i  i `* Re: transpiling to low level C2Chris M. Thomasson
24 Dec 24  i i  i  `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Chris M. Thomasson
22 Dec 24  i i  +* Re: transpiling to low level C27Waldek Hebisch
22 Dec 24  i i  i+* Re: transpiling to low level C2Michael S
22 Dec 24  i i  ii`- Re: transpiling to low level C1bart
22 Dec 24  i i  i+* Re: transpiling to low level C3Tim Rentsch
22 Dec 24  i i  ii`* Re: transpiling to low level C2Waldek Hebisch
4 Jan20:18  i i  ii `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Tim Rentsch
22 Dec 24  i i  i`* Re: transpiling to low level C21Janis Papanagnou
22 Dec 24  i i  i +* Re: transpiling to low level C4Michael S
23 Dec 24  i i  i i+- Re: transpiling to low level C1bart
23 Dec 24  i i  i i+- Re: transpiling to low level C1Michael S
23 Dec 24  i i  i i`- Re: transpiling to low level C1Tim Rentsch
23 Dec 24  i i  i +- Re: transpiling to low level C1Waldek Hebisch
23 Dec 24  i i  i +* Re: transpiling to low level C14David Brown
23 Dec 24  i i  i i+* Re: transpiling to low level C2bart
23 Dec 24  i i  i ii`- Re: transpiling to low level C1David Brown
23 Dec 24  i i  i i+* Re: transpiling to low level C10Michael S
23 Dec 24  i i  i ii+- Re: transpiling to low level C1David Brown
23 Dec 24  i i  i ii`* Re: transpiling to low level C8Tim Rentsch
24 Dec 24  i i  i ii +* Re: transpiling to low level C2Ben Bacarisse
25 Dec 24  i i  i ii `* Re: transpiling to low level C5BGB
23 Dec 24  i i  i i`- Re: transpiling to low level C1Chris M. Thomasson
23 Dec 24  i i  i `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Tim Rentsch
22 Dec 24  i i  +* Re: transpiling to low level C2Ben Bacarisse
22 Dec 24  i i  `* Re: transpiling to low level C4Kaz Kylheku
16 Dec 24  i `* Re: transpiling to low level C13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Dec 24  `* Re: transpiling to low level C2Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal