Sujet : Re: A third line of cancer treatment reversed the growth of the right paracaval lymph node
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory comp.lang.cSuivi-à : comp.theoryDate : 06. Feb 2025, 19:26:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vo2us8$32kg8$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/6/2025 10:52 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 05.02.2025 um 16:11 schrieb olcott:
On 2/5/2025 1:44 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 05.02.2025 um 04:38 schrieb olcott:
This treatment does not typically last very long and
will be immediately followed by a riskier fourth line
of treatment that has an initial success rate much higher
than its non progression mortality rate.
>
>
Halting problem solved !
>
>
The halting problem proof input does specify non-halting
behavior to its decider.
>
https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/369971402_Simulating_Termination_Analyzer_H_is_Not_Fooled_by_Pathological_Input_D
LOOOOOOOOL
Anyone that understands the C programming language
sufficiently well (thus not confused by the unreachable
"if" statement) correctly understands that DD simulated
by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction.
When we add a little computer science to this then we
know that the input to HHH does not halt.
typedef void (*ptr)();
int HHH(ptr P);
int DD()
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
int main()
{
HHH(DD);
}
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer