Sujet : Re: Python recompile
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.lang.c comp.lang.c++ comp.lang.pythonDate : 03. Mar 2025, 18:25:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vq4om7$1dbo2$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 03/03/2025 16:56,
Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 11:39:58 -0500
James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> wibbled:
On 3/3/25 11:24, geodandw wrote:
On 3/3/25 10:22, James Kuyper wrote:
On 03/03/2025 08:13, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote:
....
That sounds like a C issue to me.
>
If it were a C problem, then the C source code that produced the problem
should have been shown. It's hard to debug code that you can't see.
Why is this group so intolerant?
>
Because what you call intolerance, we call topicality. When you post a
message to a group where it is on-topic, the message gets seen and
Only an arrogant idiot would think that errors on linking object files
generated by a C compiler are not relevant in a C language group.
James Kuyper has been posting here for decades, and has helped many hundreds, or more likely thousands, of C programmers to better understand the C language. A genuine language expert, he deserves to be treated better than to be called an arrogant idiot, especially when the abuser has no discernible track record of having ever helped anyone with high quality C advice.
That may be because "Muttley" doesn't seem even to know what the C language /is/.
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
Re: Python recompile
Re: Python recompile