Re: Python recompile

bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:

On 05/03/2025 23:36, Tim Rentsch wrote:
>

bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
>

On 05/03/2025 02:20, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>

On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 01:20:07 +0000, bart wrote:
>

I maintain my own scripting language.  Building it from source - on
Windows - takes 70ms:

>
How wonderful.  Does it offer Python-style features?

>
No, it offers my-style features, that is, things I find useful:
>
[long list of features]

>
My understanding is that it is missing the two most important
features of a programming language:
>
   (1) a user manual that defines and documents the language
>
   (2) an available implementation so that other people can
       use it to write programs

>
The 1990s version, where it supported a substantial application, had a
350-page manual.  That one was used by other people to create add-on
products.
>
But it's now a personal tool and I only have reference material for my
own use.

If you post some links where I can download a current user
manual and a current compiler or interpreter, I will gladly
withdraw my comment.

Otherwise, I stand by my comment, and see no reason to
consider your alleged environment as anything other than
fiction-ware.